Neuro Computing Systems

Research Lab at KTH Stockholm, Sweden

Zero Velocity Detector for Foot-mounted Inertial Navigation System Assisted by a Dynamic Vision Sensor


Journal article


Chi-Shih Jao, K. Stewart, J. Conradt, E. Neftci, A. Shkel
International Symposium on Switching, 2020

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Jao, C.-S., Stewart, K., Conradt, J., Neftci, E., & Shkel, A. (2020). Zero Velocity Detector for Foot-mounted Inertial Navigation System Assisted by a Dynamic Vision Sensor. International Symposium on Switching.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Jao, Chi-Shih, K. Stewart, J. Conradt, E. Neftci, and A. Shkel. “Zero Velocity Detector for Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation System Assisted by a Dynamic Vision Sensor.” International Symposium on Switching (2020).


MLA   Click to copy
Jao, Chi-Shih, et al. “Zero Velocity Detector for Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation System Assisted by a Dynamic Vision Sensor.” International Symposium on Switching, 2020.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{chi-shih2020a,
  title = {Zero Velocity Detector for Foot-mounted Inertial Navigation System Assisted by a Dynamic Vision Sensor},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {International Symposium on Switching},
  author = {Jao, Chi-Shih and Stewart, K. and Conradt, J. and Neftci, E. and Shkel, A.}
}

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed a novel zero velocity detector, the Dynamic-Vision-Sensor (DVS)-aided Stance Phase Optimal dEtection (SHOE) detector, for Zero-velocity-UPdaTe (ZUPT)-aided Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) augmented by a foot-mounted event-based camera DVS128. We observed that the firing rate of the DVS consistently increased during the swing phase and decreased during the stance phase in indoor walking experiments. We experimentally determined that the optimal placement configuration for zero-velocity detection is to mount the DVS next to an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and face the sensor outward. The DVS-SHOE detector was derived in a General Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) framework, combining statistics of the conventional SHOE detector and the DVS firing rate. This paper used two methods to evaluate the proposed DVS-SHOE detector. First, we compared the detection performances of the SHOE detector and the DVS-SHOE detector. The experimental results showed that the DVS-SHOE detector achieved a lower false alarm rate than the SHOE detector. Second, we compared the navigation performance of the ZUPT-aided INS using the SHOE detector and the DVS detector. The experimental results showed that the Circular Error Probable (CEP) of the case using DVS-SHOE was reduced by around 25 % from 1.2 m to 0.9 m, as compared to the case of the SHOE detector.